Ignored, resolved, and custom mutashabihat: what to track in your own review
Not every mutashabihat issue deserves the same treatment.
Sometimes a similarity is not a real problem for you, even if it looks similar on paper. In that case, ignoring it is the honest choice. You are not saying the verses are unrelated. You are saying this is not an active confusion point in your memorization — so don't flag it, and don't clutter your map for it.
Other times it is a real problem, and then the goal is not just to label it but to resolve it. That means flagging the card, separating the two verses far apart on the mindmap, and adding the thematic distinction — until the confusion stops recurring. A resolved similarity is one you unflag and remove from your weekly check because it no longer fails.
And then there is one more important category: the similarities only you notice. Different users feel different pulls between verses. One person's mind may keep jumping between two places that another person would never confuse. When that happens to you, flag it and note the pair in your mindmap notes — your personal confusion points deserve the same treatment as the well-known ones.
So it's really about three attitudes together: some similarities should be ignored, some should be worked until resolved, and some need to be added by you because your own mind is showing a connection no list captured.
